Meister Eckhart

Library › Sermon 20

Sermon 20

On Simeon: union, likeness, and the birth of God in the soul

Sermon 20 (Evans numbering). On And behold there was a man in Jerusalem, Simeon by name, who was just and God-fearing, waiting for the consolation of the people of Israel and the Holy Ghost was in him. (Luke 2:25)

In brief

Eckhart preaches on the gospel story of old Simeon meeting the infant Christ in the temple (Luke 2:25). He does not stay with the story for long. Instead he takes the Latin sentence apart word by word, treating even the smallest conjunction as a door into his real subject, which is how the soul becomes one with God.

His argument moves through several steps. Union requires likeness, likeness is completed in a kind of birth, and that birth is what he elsewhere calls the birth of God in the soul. Stripped of the Latin grammar lessons, he is asking what it would take for a person to stop being merely near to God and start being, in some sense, the same as God, the way a carved image is the same form as what it depicts.

In plain English

Sermon 20

Et ecce, homo erat in Jerusalem cui nomen Simeon etc (Luke 2:25). Luke tells in his gospel that when the time was complete, Christ was brought to the temple. And behold, there was a man in Jerusalem named Simeon, who was righteous and devout, waiting for the consolation of Israel, and the Holy Spirit was upon him.

'And.' This little word et in Latin means joining, binding, or locking together. Things firmly bound or locked together are said to be in union. Here I mean the soul being bound, knit, and united to God. According to our teachers, union requires likeness. There is no union without likeness. Binding or knitting together, that is what union means. Nearness to me does not make likeness: my sitting beside someone, or in the same place, for example, does not. As Saint Augustine says, Lord, when I found myself far from you, it was not because of distance of place, it came from the unlikeness I found in myself. One master says that people who live and work wholly in time never agree, they never come together. According to our teachers, a thing whose life and work is in eternity and a thing whose life and work is here in time need something to bridge them. Where there is knitting and binding together there must be some likeness. The union of God and the soul is a matter of likeness. Where there is no difference there must be identity, not merely union in mutual embrace, but oneness, not merely likeness, but sameness. So we say that the Son is not like the Father but is his image, one with the Father.

One of our best teachers says that an image in stone or on a wall, with nothing underlying it, taken simply as a form, is the same form as the one whose form it is. This holds true for the soul passing into her exemplar, where there is nothing foreign, only her own form, with which she is one. Having taken on the form that is divine, we see God, we find God. God is not found in separation. When the soul passes into her exemplar and finds herself in that image alone, in that same image she finds God, and the finding of herself and the finding of God are the same act, and it is beyond time, it is the finding of God. So far as she is there, so far she is one with God. He means:

as far as a person has reached the stage where his soul is the divine image. To that extent he is divine. So far as he is there, so far he is in God, not attached to God, not merely united with God, but one and the same as God.

One master says that likeness means birth. He says further that likeness is not found in nature unless it is born. Our teachers say that fire, however fierce, would never burn if it had no hope of reproducing itself. However dry the wood supplied, it would never catch fire if fire lacked the power to generate its own kind. What fire wants is to be born in the wood, so that both become one fire, living and lasting. Put out and dead, it would be fire no longer, so it wants to keep itself going. The nature of the soul would never have taken on its own kind if she did not want God to be born in her. She would never have come forth into her own nature, would never have wanted to enter it, except in hope of this birth. Nor would God ever have brought it about if he had not meant the soul to be born into him. God acts, and the soul desires. God has the power, and the soul has the will and the capacity to have God born into her and to be born into God herself. God arranges this on purpose, so that the soul will be like him. She must wait for God to be conceived in her, and for her treasure to grow into God, wanting union with him and to be kept safe in him. God's nature pours into the light of the soul, and there she is kept safe. God means in this way to be born into her, united with her, held within her. How can that be? Do we not say that God contains himself? When he draws the soul in, she finds that God holds himself, and there she stays, dwelling nowhere else. Augustine says, as you love, so you are: loving earth, you are earthly, loving God, you will be divine. If I love God, then, shall I be God? It is not I who say this, search the scriptures. In the Prophets, God says, you are gods, and children of the Most High. I say that it is in those who are like him that God brings about this birth. If the soul had no expectation of this, she would not want to reach it. She wants to be kept safe in him, he is her life. God has a preserve, a safe place in himself, which no one can know anything about until he strips away and is rid of everything that belongs to the soul, her life, her powers, her nature, all of it must go. That means standing in that perfect light where she and God are one form, where she finds herself to be God. It is characteristic of God to have nothing foreign in him, nothing attached, nothing added. And in the same way it is fitting for the soul to have no impressions from outside, nothing put on, nothing attached. So much for the first word.

'Behold': ecce. This word ecce carries the full meaning of logos, or word, and no greater meaning could be given to it. Word, that is, God. God is a word, God's Son is a word. It carries the sense that our life and all our desire are centered on God, dependent on God, oriented toward God. As Saint Paul says, by the grace of God I am what I am. And again, I live, yet not I, but God lives in me. What more is there to say?

Homo erat. He says, behold, a man. We use the word homo for women as well as men, but the Latins withheld it from woman because of her weakness. Homo points to something whole, with nothing lacking. Homo, a man, a mortal, means one belonging to earth, carrying the sense of humility. Earth is the lowest of the elements, set in the middle with the heavens all around it, open to everything that flows down from above. All the work and waste of heaven gathers in the end in the basin of earth. Homo in another sense means moisture, as if to say, one who is watered with grace, meaning those humble souls who receive the direct inflow of grace. In this inflowing grace there arises at once that light of the mind into which God sends a ray of his unclouded splendor. In this powerful light a mortal stands as far above his fellows as a living man stands above his shadow on the wall. This light has great power, both because it is itself beyond time and place, and because anything it touches is stripped of time and place and bodily likeness and everything foreign to it. As I have often said before, if there were no time, no place, and nothing else besides, it would all be one being. The person who in this sense is one, and throws himself into the ground of humility, will there be watered with grace.

Now for the third point: this light strips away time and place. 'There was a man.' Who gave him this light? The light did. This word erat belongs properly to God. In the Latin language there is no word so fitting for God as erat. John, in his gospel, comes to use erat as another word for pure being. Everything else is an addition, but addition is possible only in thought, not by real addition but by mental separation. Goodness and truth are additions, at least in theory, but the bare essence with nothing added to it is what erat means. Again, erat implies birth, an end to becoming. I was coming today, now I have come, and if we take time out of my coming and my having arrived, then coming and come draw together into one. Where coming and come meet, there we are born and remade and reshaped into our original form. I have often said that as long as a thing's being is a matter of concrete existence, it will never be created anew. It can be refurbished and given fresh color, the way an old seal is restamped and renewed. A pagan teacher says, things there cannot be worn down by time, there is the blessed life in the forever, faultless, free of care, unmixed being. Solomon says, there is nothing new under the sun, though this is rarely understood in its proper sense. Everything under the sun grows old and dies, but there, nothing is anything but new. Time brings two things, age and decay. What the sun shines on exists in time. Creatures are here, and they come from God, but there, where they are in God, they are not at all what they are here. They differ as much as the sun differs from the moon, and far more. Erat in eo, he says, the Holy Spirit was in him, in which there is both being and becoming. 'There was a man.' Where was he? In Jerusalem. Jerusalem means vision of peace, and stands, in short, for human peace and well-being. It may mean more than this. Paul says, the peace that surpasses all understanding will keep your hearts and minds. May God grant that we are fit to enter into this peace, which is God himself. So help us God. Amen.

Plain-English version by Gregory Lahn, from C. de B. Evans's translation of Franz Pfeiffer's edition (London, 1924), which is in the public domain.

Read the 1924 translation

AND BEHOLD THERE WAS A MAN... SIMEON

Et ecce, homo erat in Jerusalem cui nomen Simeon etc, (Luc, 2 35). St Luke relates in his gospel that when the days were accomplished Christ was brought to the temple. And behold there was a man in Jerusalem, Simeon by name, who was just and God-fearing, waiting for the consolation of the people of Israel and the Holy Ghost was in him.'

'And behold.' This particle et in Latin signifies joining, binding or locking together. Things fast bound or locked together are described as in union. Here I refer to the soul being bound, knit, united to God. According to our doctors, union postulates likeness. There is no union without likeness. Binding or knitting together, that is the meaning of union. Nearness to me does not constitute likeness: my sitting by someone or in the same place, for example. As St Augustine says, Lord, when I found myself afar from thee it was not from the remoteness of the place, it came of thy unlikeness wherein I found myself. One master says, people living and working wholly in time never agree, they never come together. According to our doctors, a thing whose life and work is in eternity and a thing whose life and work is here in time require a go-between. Where there is knitting and binding together there must be some likeness. The union of God and the soul is a matter of likeness. Where no difference exists there must be identity; not merely union in mutual embrace, but one; not merely likeness, but the same. Wherefore we say that the Son is not like the Father but he is his image, he is one with the Father.

One of our best doctors says that an image in stone or on the wall, with no foundation to it, taken simply as a form, is the same form as his whose form it is. For the soul passing into her exemplar wherein is no alien thing, only her form wherewith it is one, this doctrine holds good. Having gotten the form that is divine we behold God, we find God. In separation God is not found. On passing into her exemplar and finding herself in that image alone, in that same image the soul finds God and the finding of herself and God, which is all the same act and is timeless, is the finding of God. So far as she is therein so far she is one with God. He means:

as far as a man is at the stage where his soul is the divine image. Then so far as he is he is divine. So far therein so far in God, not annexed, not united but one and the same.

One master says, likeness means birth. Further he states that like is not met with in nature unless it is born. Doctors declare that fire, however fierce, would never burn had it no hope of propagation. However dry the wood supplied it would never catch fire if it lacked power to generate its kind. What fire wants is to be born in wood, for all to be one fire, living and lasting. Extinguished and dead it were fire no more, so it wants to keep in. The nature of the soul would never have gotten its kind were it not for her wanting to have God begotten in her; she would not have proceeded into her nature, would never have wanted to enter therein, except in the hope of this birth; nor would God ever have brought it to pass had he not meant the soul to be born into him. God does and the soul desires. God has the energy and the soul has the will and the power to have God born into her and herself into God. This God contrives with intent that the soul shall be like him. She must needs wait for God to be gotten in her and for her treasure to grow into God, desiring union and the safekeeping of God. God's nature pours into the light of the soul and therein she is preserved. God purposes thus to be born into her, united with her, contained in her. How can that be? Do we not say that God contains himself? When he draws in the soul she finds that God is self-contained and there she stays abiding nowhere else. Augustine says: 'As thou lovest so thou art: loving earth thou art earthly, loving God thou shalt be divine.' If I love God then, shall I be God? It is not I who say so; search the scriptures. In the Prophets God says: 'Ye are gods and the children of the Most High.' I say that it is in his likes that God gives this birth. Had she no expectation of this the soul would not want to attain it. She wants to be preserved in him, he is her life. God has a preserve, a safe place in himself, which man can know nothing about until he pares off and is rid of all that belongs to the soul — her life, her powers, her nature, all must go. And that means standing in that perfect light where she and God are one form, where she finds herself God. It is characteristic of God to have nothing alien in him, nor on him nor added to him. And likewise it behoves the soul to have no outside impressions, nothing put on, nothing annexed. So much for the first (word).

'And behold': ecce. This word ecce has all the meaning of logos (or word) and it could be given no greater. Word, i.e., God. God is a word, God's Son is a word. It conveys the idea of our life and all our desire being centred in and dependent upon and oriented to God. As St Paul says, 'By the grace of God I am that I am.' And again, 'I live, yet not I but God liveth in me.' What more?

Homo erat. He says, 'Behold, a man.' We use the word homo for women as well as for men, but the Latins refused it to woman because of her weakness. Homo denotes something whole, nothing lacking. Homo, a man, a mortal, means one pertaining to earth, implying humility. Earth is the basest of the elements and placed in the midst with the heavens all round, it lies open to every celestial emanation. All the work and waste of heaven is caught midway in the sink of earth. Homo in yet another sense means moisture; as much as to say, one who is watered with grace; referring to those humble souls who receive the immediate influx of grace. In this inflowing grace there forthwith arises that light of the mind into which God is sending a ray of his unclouded splendour. In this powerful light a mortal is as far above his fellows as a live man is above his shadow on the wall. This light is vastly potent, not merely being in itself exempt from time and place, but anything it falls upon it robs of time and place and bodily semblance and everything extraneous thereto. As I have often said before, were there no time nor place nor aught beside it would be all one being. The man who is in this sense one and casts himself into the ground of humility, there will be watered with grace.

Concerning the third point: this light deprives of time and place. 'There was a man.' Who gave him this light? The light did. This word erat belongs expressly to God. In the Latin tongue there is no word so proper to God as erat. John in his gospel comes to using erat as a synonym for pure being. Things are all extras: but addition is possible only in thought; not by mental addition but by mental abstraction. Goodness and truth are additions, in theory at least, but the abstract essence without anything to it is what is meant by erat. Again, erat implies birth, an end of becoming. I was coming to-day, now I have come; and if we eliminate time from my coming and having arrived, then coming and come close up into one. Where coming and come coincide, there we are born and re-made and re-formed into his primitive form. I have often said that all the while a thing's aught is a matter of concrete existence it never will be re-created; refurbished it may be and coloured afresh, even as a seal that is old: that is restamped and renewed. A heathen doctor says, Things yonder no time can stale; there is the blessed life in the evermore: faultless, care-free, unalloyed being. Solomon says: 'There is nothing new under the sun,' though this is seldom taken in its proper sense. Everything under the sun grows old and dies, but yonder is nothing but new. Time brings two things: age and

decay. What the sun shines on is present in time. Creatures are here and are from God, but yonder where they are in God they are not at all the same as they are here; they are as different as the sun is from the moon, far more so. Erat in eo, he says: "the Holy Ghost was in him," wherein is being and becoming. "There was a man." Where was he? In Jerusalem. Jerusalem meaning vision of peace; it stands, in short, for man's peace and prosperity. It possibly signifies more. Paul says, "The peace that passeth all understanding keep your hearts and minds." Pray God we may be such as to enter into this peace, which is himself. So help us God. Amen.

Go deeper with this sermon

The spiritual guide to Sermon 20

The guide walks you through the inner journey this sermon describes, where it meets your own days, and the ways people go wrong trying to live it. It ends with a practice for the week, a meditation and questions for reflection.

It is in Sermons of Meister Eckhart, Explained, Volume 2.

Get Volume 2

Live this teaching

Detachment is Week 2 of The Ground of the Soul

An 8-week guided path with daily practices, weekly guided audio and a workbook.

See the course